TRAINING & CONSULTANCY PLT (Reg. No. :
ISO/DIS9001:2015 QMS - News and Latest Development
Quality management systems – Requirements is currently being revised. The revision work has reached
the "Draft International Standard" or "DIS" stage. The target for completing this work and publishing a
revised edition of the standard is around September 2015. In order to help users and other organizations
prepare for the advent of the revised edition, the International Accreditation Forum (IAF) has prepared the
Transition Planning Guidance document, with the assistance of ISO/TC 176/SC2/WG23.
introductory and awareness training provides guidance for the transition from ISO 9001:2008 to ISO
9001:2015. It identifies activities which should be considered by relevant interested parties and to
increase understanding of the context of ISO 9001:2015. The revision introduces significant changes and will be
published in September 2015. The standard is based on Annex SL of the ISO Directives, a high-level
structure (HLS) which standardizes sub clause titles, core text, common terms and core definitions to enhance
compatibility and alignment with other ISO management system standards.
In 100 Words Or Less
The main changes in the new version
of ISO/DIS 9001:2015 are:
the adoption of the HLS as set
out in Annex SL of ISO Directives Part One,
an explicit requirement for
risk-based thinking to support and improve the understanding and application of the process
fewer prescribed requirements,
less emphasis on documents,
improved applicability for
a requirement to define the
boundaries of the QMS,
increased emphasis on
greater emphasis on achieving desired outcomes to
improve customer satisfaction.
Should you need a brief explanation, call
us at M: 012-505
2720, Tel : +605-805 2722or email us
We offer free explanation on how you can
get prepare with this ISO9001:2015 QMS standard transition change.
Click to download
the ISO/DIS9001:2015 QMS or ISO/DIS14001:2015 EMS Introductory & Awareness Training for reading
Here are the
issues” that either spurred development or
will drive major changes as a result of ISO 9001:2015’s release:
1. Periodic review suitability of the international standard (every 5 years)
ISO 9001 was
initially released in 1987. The process of periodic review is embedded in all International Organization for
Standardization (ISO) management systems standards and requires that member bodies (country committees) examine
the relevance of a given standard every five years.
The choices are
to continue publication without revision, revise or discontinue issuance. The obvious benefit is to
ensure relevance, and in
the case of ISO 9001, relevance is of utmost importance. With more than 1 million registered users, content
improvement with special attention to trends within international trade and how modern business operates are of
exchange," is an excellent example: When ISO 9001 was first issued in 1987, computers were in their relative
infancy compared to today’s reliance on personal computers and their use in data management and records. Until
the issuance of ISO 9001:2015 and its normative reference, ISO 9000:2015, documents and records were
traditionally thought to be hard copy.
The revised ISO
9001 will refer to format (language, software version, graphics and media, whether paper or electronic), in the
now all-inclusive phrase "control of documented information." Separate references and clauses related to
documents and records are gone.
Periodic review also revealed the service
industry’s long-standing claim that the standard is mostly written with manufacturing organizations in mind. As
a result, ISO 9001:2015 will no longer use the term "product," but instead says "products and services"
throughout the document. It’s a major change, and one that goes to the heart of an aging
(SC1) representatives who develop and maintain ISO 9000 worked alongside those of subcommittee 2 (SC2), working
group 24 (WG), which is chartered to write the contents of ISO 9001 to further expand and clarify the output of
a process to include services, software and other products. This is a major improvement, and expectations are
high with regard to its acceptance within the user community.
2. User survey
Changes in ISO
9001:2015 are also the byproduct of a further ISO requirement to survey the user base to determine needed areas
of improvement. It took years to amass the results of thousands of respondents, and you may have contributed to
the input. The net result was a series of recommendations that eventually found their way to the design
specification for the writing group to follow.
A look back
shows that the release of ISO 9001:2008 was little more than clarification of several elements within the last
major shift in the standard with the release of the 2000 revision. It, too, credited much of its content to a
prior user survey. The bottom line is that the 2015 edition will be the result of far more than a few
individuals’ thoughts. Instead, it will stand atop a foundation of actual users’ concerns and technical
3. Sector-specific input
important input to the 2015 revision came from groups that use ISO 9001 as the foundation for their standards.
The telecommunications standard, TL9000, aerospace’s AS9100 and medical devices’ ISO 13485 are examples.
Representatives of each of these and other standards have routinely attended drafting committee meetings and
offered comments throughout the ISO 9001 life cycle.
The addition of
the concept of risk ("risk-based approach") within the 2015 version is often credited to several sector-specific
concerns voiced in recent years. Users of these similar sector-specific standards have significant interest in
the outcome of any revision to ISO 9001 simply because when it changes, they are subject to adoption or
abandonment of their foundational content.
As of this
writing, strong opposition has been lodged by several sector-specific groups, primarily regarding what has
become known as the new high-level structure.
4. High-level structure
management board (TMB) within ISO central and the joint technical coordination group (JTCG) have determined that
all management systems standards follow a new format, called the "high-level structure," as defined in Annex SL
(previously Guide 83). With the addition of several new elements, or clauses, the impact of this new structure
will be significant to many current users of the standard.
attention was devoted to challenging the mandate and perhaps submitting a request to deviate from adopting the
new approach. Two efforts took place simultaneously: one to petition for release from the high-level structure
and the other to go forward with the rearrangement of 2008 content within the newly defined clause
9001:2015 clearly settles the dispute and places ISO 9001 within what will become a unified and consistent
family of management standards. Voting, by the way, started on July 10 and ends on Oct. 10. Comments,
many of which will undoubtedly question the use of the high-level structure, are expected to be numerous. Note,
however, the definitive text within Annex A, clause 1, of the ISO/DIS 9001:2015 makes clear that wholesale
documentation restructuring is not a requirement:
The clause structure and
some of the terminology of this international standard, in comparison with ISO 9001:2008, have been changed
to improve alignment with other management systems standards.
The consequent changes in
the structure and terminology do not need to be reflected in the documentation of an organization’s quality
management system (QMS).
The structure of clauses is
intended to provide a coherent presentation of requirements rather than a model for documenting an
organization’s policies, objectives and processes. There is no requirement for the structure of an
organization’s QMS documentation to mirror that of this international standard.
5. Be cautious
The last time
ISO 9001 revised its structural components with the issuance of ISO 9001:2000, a flood of consultants’ offers,
articles, books and lectures preceded and followed its release. Full disclosure—I am one of several who will
fall into this group—but the following message remains the same: A user’s guide is being developed by members of
WG24, scheduled to be available for purchase simultaneously with the release of ISO 9001:2015. If you feel as
though you will need additional input, it’s probably all you’ll need.
progressive organizations, revisions and additions should be relatively straightforward. Yes, several components
of the 2015 revision
might be confusing. There always are questions, but the expected flood of training offers and help from your
registrar and others will likely answer most concerns.
registrar should represent more than an agency that schedules an occasional visit. Proactive registrars will
recognize the need to develop a workable plan to convert their client base to the 2015 revision within the
three-year requirement. Ask your auditor what is expected and when to implement. Short of actual consulting,
most will be glad to help.
6. You have until 2018
revisions at your own pace because you have until 2018. Once again, work with any available guidance from your
registrar. Join in the discussion with others who have gone before you, but beware of foot dragging. If the 2000
revision was any example, a flood of registrants waited until the
final months to complete their work, resulting in registrar scheduling nightmares.
"failure to plan is planning to fail" is fully in effect when it comes to your organization’s response to ISO
9001:2015. For some organizations, the task will be little more than appending an unnecessary equivalency matrix
to their quality manuals and writing a few new words to cover additional clauses. This is the group that prefers
minimal investment and therefore can typically expect minimal outcomes.
you decide to use the 2015 revision to truly improve your organization, it will take time and practice to get it
right. Implementation planning and goal setting using project management tools is highly recommended. There is
simply no substitute for a well-designed, phased approach to implementing a standard. Its numerous
interdependencies require care to implement in the proper sequence and steadily build either atop or adjacent to
each step to provide mutual support and value. Just don’t take too long.
following are major changes within ISO/DIS 9001:2015. As mentioned in the beginning of the article, note that
revisions can be expected based on comments received. Several of the elements that follow will require
additional development within each organization to address overall compliance methods.
7. Context of the organization
an organization and its context, and the needs and expectations of interested parties, is central to maintaining
a business. Section 4.1 of the revision requires an organization to determine "external and internal issues that
are relevant to its purpose and its strategic direction."
After they are
determined, the organization is to monitor those internal and external issues. The clause further requires an
assessment of the organization’s ability to achieve the intended results of its QMS. The tool most capable of
supporting compliance to section 4.1 is a SWOT or strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats analysis.
Another tool, the balanced scorecard, is also a likely candidate. Both are products of business, not necessarily
At its face,
"business thinking" is a welcome addition to the standard, addressing a long-standing complaint that ISO 9001 is
not understood as a business system with an output of quality.
commitment to the business system is also thoroughly addressed in Clause 5.1.1—Leadership and
commitment for the quality management system. The theme of uniting business and quality continues in this
section with the addition of elements such as "ensuring that the quality policy and
quality objectives are established for the QMS and are compatible with the strategic direction and the context
of the organization."
If that was not
a clear enough call to unite business and quality systems, the requirement that leaders "ensure the integration
of the quality management system requirements into the organization’s business practices" is the clarion cry to
stop the practice of visualizing quality management as somehow separate from business
9. Planning for the QMS
"actions to address risks and opportunities," is perhaps the single-most talked about addition to the standard.
Section 6.1 weaves together previous elements 4.1 and 4.2, understanding the context of the organization, and
the needs and expectations of interested parties by requiring that analysis of these issues become actionable
risk-based plans, targets and goals.
accompanying note to section 6.1.2 provides excellent guidance in this regard, saying "Options to address risks
and opportunities can include: avoiding risk, taking risk in order to pursue an opportunity, eliminating the
risk source, changing the likelihood or consequences, sharing the risk or retaining risk by informed
There is no
mention of preventive action in ISO 9001:2015; it is expressed through the phrase "risk-based approach."
Incidentally, sections 6.1.1 and 6.1.2 continue the theme of borderless business and quality system planning and
management. The risk-based approach in ISO 9001:2015 is basic: After you know your challenges, develop
appropriate plans and monitoring methods to mitigate the risk of
inaction in these defined areas.
10. Organizational knowledge
ushers in the discipline of knowledge management through the requirement that "the organization shall determine
the knowledge necessary for the operation of its processes and to achieve conformity of products and services."
The point is that knowledge—what, how, when and often why—is required to generate consistent and conforming
the right people need access to this knowledge to create this desired outcome. Organizational knowledge
management requires analysis and planning that are unique to each organization to balance the typical blend of
competent people no longer requiring tools—such as work instructions—against those who do.
9001:2015, section 4.3, determining the scope of the QMS, you will no longer find references to the term
"exclusions. " Instead,
it’s up to the organization to decide which elements do not apply.
The choice to
disregard a requirement is not allowed, however, if it pertains to normal operations. Furthermore, the
text states, "If any requirement(s) of this international standard cannot be applied, this shall not affect the
organization’s ability or responsibility to ensure conformity of products and services." Once again, the issue
of applicability is tied to whether your organization is capable of producing consistent, conforming
12. Annex C
Annex C, a
formal introduction to the ISO 10000 portfolio of quality management standards, is a wonderful addition to ISO
9001. There are three SCs within ISO technical committee 176. ISO 9000 is the responsibility of SC1, ISO 9001
and ISO 9004 are the responsibility of SC2, but subcommittee 3 (SC3) is perhaps best described as having
responsibility for everything else.
guidance documents: excellent resources for the world community to apply to its QMSs. If you are in search of
moving your organization to the next level in any number of critical disciplines, the work of SC3’s ISO 10000
series of documents is for you. In Annex C, ISO/DIS 9001:2015 offers a clearly stated synopsis of many of these
13. Annex A
clarification of new structure, terminology and concepts, is another important and informative addition to ISO
9001. Many issues in this article are discussed in this section in well written and concise
"externally provided products and services" is explained as follows in section A8: "Whether the organization is
purchasing from a supplier, through outsourcing or by any other means, the organization is required to take a
risk-based approach to determine the types of controls appropriate to particular external providers and
externally provided products and services."
The whole topic
of outsourcing, especially questions regarding what goods or services are or are not outsourced, has been
problematic in prior editions of ISO 9001. Given the above explanation and regardless of what is obtained
through outsourcing, organizations are required to take a risk-based approach. This is a welcome,
easy-to-understand stipulation and, of course, is linked closely with the concept of the risk-based approach
14. Quality management
There are now
seven quality management principles instead of the previous eight. Regardless, a disturbing few ISO 9001
practitioners have truly made these principles the foundation of their QMSs. Now is the chance to revisit the
updated and revised seven principles to enable change throughout your organization at the bedrock
introduction states, "The ISO portfolio of quality management system standards are based on these seven quality
management principles" in much the same manner as an organization would use its mission statement to frame
actions and discussions. They are a point of reference -a beacon in the storm—or perhaps a constant set of
reminders of what is right and fair in promoting goodwill and best practices.
15. ISO 9000:2015
9001:2015 does not yet cite ISO 9000 as its normative reference, but it will after it’s released as the final
draft international standard (FDIS)—expected in the middle of next year. The ISO/DIS 9001:2015 now includes a
large collection of terms and their definitions in section 3 as a convenience to the writing
definition, however, is derived verbatim from ISO 9000. As the bulk of the revision will be completed with the
release of the FDIS, section 2 also will be revised to once again cite ISO 9000 as its normative
ISO/International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC) Directives, part two, section 6.2.2 states that normative
references are considered to be "indispensable for the application of the document." A normative reference is,
therefore, more than a casual reference to another document that may be helpful. It’s no wonder ISO 9001 and ISO
9000 are often sold as a set.
Changes in ISO
9001:2015 are an opportunity to revisit organizational areas that have not performed well in the past. An
awareness of the upcoming changes in ISO 9001:2015 will enable quality professionals to use the new standard as
a vanguard to spur their organizations forward.
Please do not
hesitate to call us to gather more information to support your needs and preparation for transition towards the
newly revised ISO/DIS9001:2015 QMS.
Contact Person : Mr. Eddie Kuang / Ms. Michelle Khoo
E : email@example.com or firstname.lastname@example.org
M : +6012-505-2720 / +6012-550-2721
T : +605-805-2722 / +605-808-8028
F : +605-805-2721